Trump’s strikes on Iran: a ‘spectacular success’?

Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Less than $3 per week

View Profile

The Explainer

Talking Points

The Week Recommends

Newsletters

From the Magazine

The Week Junior

Food & Drink

Personal Finance

All Categories

Newsletter sign up

Trump’s strikes on Iran: a ‘spectacular success’?

Military humiliations ‘expose the brittleness’ of Tehran’s ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program

Newsletter sign up

Trump ‘made the right call in bombing Iran’

(Image credit: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)

The Week UK

28 June 2025

“He came, he bombed, he ended the war.” That’s how Donald Trump would sum up the events of the past week, said The Economist, but the reality was a little more complicated.

Last Saturday, 48 hours after giving Iran a two-week deadline, the US president launched the largest-ever strike by B-2 stealth bombers. Seven of the planes undertook a 37-hour surprise mission during which they dropped 14 bunker-buster bombs on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Trump hailed the operation as a “spectacular military success”, saying the bombs had “totally obliterated” the sites.
The next day, in what was seen as a token response, Iran fired 14 missiles at a US base in Qatar. All but one of the missiles were intercepted and there were no casualties. Hours later, Trump announced the end of what he called the “12-day war” between Iran and Israel. He subsequently rounded on both sides for continuing to fight, raging that “they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing”, after which the fragile ceasefire appeared to hold.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week’s Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Trump has made many terrible decisions during his time as president, said Eliot A. Cohen in The Atlantic, but he made the right call in bombing Iran. The regime simply can’t be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. Tehran is the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism, and it might very well use such a weapon on Israel, which, as a former Iranian president repeatedly crowed, is “a one-bomb country”.

Neutralising this problem, even if only temporarily, is a positive result. Iran’s recent weak position created an opening for a strike on its nuclear facilities and the moment needed to be seized, agreed The Wall Street Journal. The risks were acceptable. Sure, Iran could try to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes, but only if it’s willing to lose its main source of revenue and run the risk of the US sinking its entire navy. Trump has called Iran’s bluff and helped create a “rare opportunity for a more peaceful Middle East”.
If the ceasefire holds, it will mean that “this harrowing episode has concluded without triggering World War III, as some feared”, said Michelle Goldberg in The New York Times. But the conflict hasn’t actually achieved the desired result of ending Iran’s nuclear programme. If anything, it may have increased that threat. Leaked US intelligence reports have suggested that America’s bunker-buster bombs didn’t knock out all of the centrifuges in the buried Fordow plant, and may have only set back Iran’s nuclear programme by a few months.
Until recently, Iran was at least partly cooperating with the International Atomic Energy Agency. After Trump’s reckless intervention, it will be even more determined to push secretly for a bomb. Iran still has a stockpile of 400kg of 60% enriched uranium, which even in its present state could be used as a crude radiological weapon, said David Ignatius in The Washington Post. US and Israeli sources say they know where it is, and we must hope they can find it and make it safe. “Otherwise, the fuse on the Iranian bomb is still lit.”
It’s quite possible that Iran could pick up the pieces and develop a bomb over the next couple of years, said Ilan Goldenberg in Foreign Affairs. US and Israeli intelligence will need to keep a close eye on it whatever happens. The dream scenario now is that Iranian reformists win a power struggle with the hardliners, and opt to ditch the country’s nuclear ambitions for the sake of an easier life. But given how well entrenched the regime is, we’re more likely to end up with a situation akin to the one in Iraq after the first Gulf War – in which Iran is left with a weakened, but “more radicalised”, regime.
The only thing keeping Iran’s despised theocrats in power, said Karim Sadjadpour in The New York Times, is the fact that they control a repressive apparatus that’s “willing to kill en masse”, whereas their more numerous opponents are “unarmed, unorganised and unwilling to die en masse”. But that balance may change over the months ahead as the country comes to terms with recent events. Military humiliations “expose the brittleness” of ageing regimes. Witness the Soviet Union after its Afghan invasion, or Argentina’s junta after the Falklands War.
In the absence of regime change – “or a definitive shift in mentality” – we can expect a return to conflict, said Gideon Rachman in the FT. With his talk of a “12-day war”, Trump was suggesting that this could be “a reordering moment for the Middle East” akin to the Six-Day War of 1967, in which Israel defeated Egypt, Syria and Jordan. It’s worth remembering, though, that six years after that conflict, “Israel was once again at war with Egypt and Syria”.

Explore More

Donald Trump

Sign up for Today’s Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

The Week UK

Social Links Navigation

5 expletive-laden cartoons about bad language

Artists take on Trump’s quest for a Nobel Peace Prize, cursing at the dinner table, and more

Codeword: June 28, 2025

The Week’s daily codeword puzzle

Sudoku medium: June 28, 2025

The Week’s daily medium sudoku puzzle

You might also like

Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?

today’s big question
The cost of keeping Trump happy

GOP races to revise megabill after Senate rulings

A Senate parliamentarian ruled that several changes to Medicaid included in Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” were not permissible

Trump plans Iran talks, insists nuke threat gone

‘The war is done’ and ‘we destroyed the nuclear,’ said President Trump

Trump embraces NATO after budget vow, charm offensive

The president reversed course on his longstanding skepticism of the trans-Atlantic military alliance

Bibi’s back: what will Netanyahu do next?

Today’s Big Question
Riding high after a series of military victories, Israel’s PM could push for peace in Gaza – or secure his own position with snap election

Is Trump sidelining Congress’ war powers?

Today’s Big Question
The Iran attack renews a long-running debate

Trump judge pick told DOJ to defy courts, lawyer says

Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official nominated by Trump for a lifetime seat, stands accused of encouraging government lawyers to mislead the courts and defy judicial orders

The ambiguous legal state of ectopic pregnancy care

The Explainer
Rep. Kat Cammack’s accusations of ‘fearmongering’ are the latest example of how mixed messages are complicating the debate around abortion

View More â–¸

Contact Future’s experts

Terms and Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy

Advertise With Us

The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street

Read More…