Photographers always say bigger sensors are better, but I prefer Micro Four Thirds for these two genres – 1v1 Video Chat & LIve Streaming & Influencer Subscription

Digital Camera World

Digital Camera World THE HOME OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY

Search Digital Camera World

View Profile

Accessories

Buying Guides

The Photography & Video Show

Digital Camera

Australian Camera

Australian ProPhoto

Photography Magazines

Why subscribe?

Issues filled with product reviews, latest updates, expert advice and more
Delivered to your Android or IOS device
Every issue is packed with photo tips, kit reviews and inspiration

From$12View

Camera news
Camera rumors
Photography & Video Show
Photo mag deals
Cheatsheets

You may like

Bigger camera sensors are rarely better – here’s proof

Compact camera sensor sizes compared. Here’s why bigger isn’t always better!

This pro photographer prefers a 35mm prime for portraits – and this is why

When I’m heading out to photograph birds and animals, I typically gravitate to Micro Four Thirds (MFT). I review cameras as part of my job, which means I have access to a wider range of different camera models (albeit temporarily) than the average camera enthusiast.

One of the things I never seem to have enough of when photographing wildlife is zoom, which is why I often reach for an MFT camera with a good zoom lens.
Micro Four Thirds has a 2x crop factor, which means a 300mm lens is actually a 600mm equivalent. That gives you twice as much reach as a typical full-frame lens.
Now, you can crop a full-frame image in half and get similar results – especially if you invest in a 50MP+ model. But even then, Micro Four Thirds lenses tend to be smaller and lighter than full-frame optics with similar reach. If I’m hiking with a lens hoping to see some wildlife, I’m going to hike farther with a lighter lens.

Get the Digital Camera World Newsletter
The best camera deals, reviews, product advice, and unmissable photography news, direct to your inbox!
Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.
While MFT offers more telephoto reach, the downside is that smaller pixels tend to be susceptible to diffraction sooner. Diffraction is a softening that happens with narrow apertures. This tends to happen faster with smaller pixels, which tend to be found on smaller Micro Four Thirds sensors.
In effect, that means some lenses – particularly those with narrower maximum apertures – may be softer than some full-frame lenses.
The other challenge with using Micro Four Thirds for wildlife is that smaller sensors tend to be more susceptible to grain at high ISOs. Wildlife photography typically requires faster shutter speeds, which usually means shooting with higher ISOs, even during the day.
Diffraction and noise work together to create one of the biggest downsides to choosing Micro Four Thirds for wildlife – the images aren’t quite as sharp as some of the high-end full-frame lenses and optics that I’ve tried. But the trade-off is smaller, lighter gear and a much longer telephoto reach.
As a hobbyist wildlife photographer who partakes in wildlife photography for the simple joy of it, I prefer using lighter gear over the pixel-peeping-ready but heavier gear.

A mosquito photographed with the OM System M.Zuiko 90mm f/3.5 Macro lens (Image credit: Paul Burrows)
The second genre where I think Micro Four Thirds has an advantage is macro photography. Like with wildlife photography, MFT’s crop factor means that you can get closer photos without getting physically closer.
An excellent example of this is the OM System M.Zuiko 90mm f/3.5 Macro lens. While it’s fairly easy to find a 1:1 macro on a full-frame camera, a 2:1 is rare. And while there are some macro lenses for larger sensors (Laowa immediately comes to mind) with more than a 1:1 magnification, a 2:1 with autofocus is rare. The OM System 90mm macro is a 2:1 macro, which is twice as close as a typical 1:1 macro lens.
The lens also works with teleconverters for a 4:1 equivalent that’s exceptional for tiny subjects like snowflakes and insects. But, like with telephoto lenses, diffraction may come into play, which is especially true when using a teleconverter.
I could phrase this another way: I don’t love Micro Four Thirds for the sensors, I like Micro Four Thirds for the lenses. The crop factor can be a key advantage with wildlife photography, particularly when planning to hike with a camera. Add in the availability of a 2:1 autofocus macro lens, and MFT is typically the first thing that comes to mind when considering a camera for wildlife or macro photography.
Yes, full-frame cameras have a large advantage when it comes to gathering more light, creating bokeh, working in low light and getting ultra-sharp, high-resolution shots. I’m not saying anything to the contrary. But full-frame sensors are not always better all the time for every photographer.
Depending on the genre, factors like telephoto reach, macro capabilities and a compact size may sit higher on the list of priorities – and for genres like wildlife and macro, the advantages of a smaller sensor are harder to ignore.
You may also like…
Browse the best macro lenses, the best wildlife cameras, or the best Micro Four Thirds cameras.

Micro Four Thirds

Hillary K. Grigonis

Social Links Navigation

With more than a decade of experience writing about cameras and technology, Hillary K. Grigonis leads the US coverage for Digital Camera World. Her work has appeared in Business Insider, Digital Trends, Pocket-lint, Rangefinder, The Phoblographer, and more. Her wedding and portrait photography favors a journalistic style. She’s a former Nikon shooter and a current Fujifilm user, but has tested a wide range of cameras and lenses across multiple brands. Hillary is also a licensed drone pilot.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

Bigger camera sensors are rarely better – here’s proof

Compact camera sensor sizes compared. Here’s why bigger isn’t always better!

This pro photographer prefers a 35mm prime for portraits – and this is why

I tried cheap cameras from Canon, Sony and Nikon on one of the most difficult subjects – this is the camera that stood out

Why we’re all obsessed with megapixels (and why we shouldn’t be)

The best travel camera: compact and portable cameras to take anywhere

Latest in Nature and Wildlife Photography

I tried cheap cameras from Canon, Sony and Nikon on one of the most difficult subjects – this is the camera that stood out

In a mirrorless world, Canon DSLRs are capturing cutting-edge science under the ocean

I can’t believe I nabbed this shot of birds in midair with a cheap mirrorless camera. Is this evidence of how far autofocus technology has come, or just dumb luck?

BBC Earth’s complete wildlife photography masterclass is now available in one stunning video – and it’s FREE!

Parrot finds its way inside Nikon’s flagship store just as photographers are testing out bird-photography lenses

WildPhotos returns: A one-day gathering for nature photography’s leading voices

Latest in Features

I’ve tried lots of options, but this 360 camera is now my favorite solution for behind-the-scenes content of my professional photo shoots

Trends have made Fujifilm exceptionally popular – but the Fujifilm X-T30 II is actually the brand’s best-selling mirrorless on Amazon

I scoured New York City’s largest gathering of photographers and creators for the coolest photo and video accessories. These were my favorites

The RX0 II – how does Sony keep making brilliant disasters and miss open goals?

I’d buy this monster $1000 camera if I were a wildlife enthusiast first and a photographer second

The Olympus Stylus 1 is a vintage compact camera with an excellent zoom lens – and I really wish OM System would make a modern version