Calls for SNP to drop nuclear opposition but party says Starmer is ‘pandering’ to Trump on defence

Calls for SNP to drop nuclear opposition but party says Starmer is 'pandering' to Trump on defence

In a week that began with the US launching strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the world鈥檚 most powerful nations have now turned their attention to their own defence. Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK would buy 12 new F-35A fighter jets capable of transporting nuclear bombs while at the NATO summit in the Netherlands Donald Trump praised members for agreeing to spend five per cent of their GDP on defence. A newly-published National Security Strategy stated the UK has to 鈥渁ctively prepare for the possibility of the UK coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario鈥. Politicians from across the spectrum have been debating what this preparation looks like and whether it should include nuclear weapons. Here the Sunday Mail speaks to Labour鈥檚 Scottish Secretary Ian Murray and the SNP鈥檚 defence spokesman Dave Doogan about their very different views on how to protect the nation from foreign threats. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray has called for the SNP to rethink its stance against nuclear weapons . The Labour MP for Edinburgh South changed his stance on nukes in recent months, having been a 鈥渓ifelong鈥 opponent of the weapons previously. In February he was praised by disarmament campaigners for his support of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, but a month later he said he was 鈥減roud鈥 that Scotland hosted Trident. Last week he re-stated his support of the deadly weapons and said 鈥淚t鈥檚 really important when circumstances change for that to happen.鈥 He made the comments the day before Starmer announced he was buying 12 new US-made fighter jets, which are capable of carrying conventional weapons as well as American nuclear bombs. Speaking exclusively to the Sunday Mail Murray said the First Minister and his party should review their opposition to nukes. He said: 鈥淎ny responsible government has to make sure they put their national security and the safety of their own people first. 鈥淪cots only have to turn on their TVs and pick up their newspapers to read about the fact that there is a changing global instability. 鈥淚 do think the Scottish Government should readdress it. 鈥淒efence is really important and the two key things that come from that defence posture are jobs and growth in Scotland.鈥 Murray said the country played a 鈥渄isproportionate role鈥 in Britain鈥檚 defence and he wanted to exploit the 鈥渄ividend鈥 that comes from that. He said: 鈥淢y views on nuclear weapons changed some time ago but they have been underlined and emphasised by the fact that the issue of nuclear weapons and deterrence have become a huge global stability issue. 鈥淔or the Scottish government to tell Rolls Royce, one of the most respected British institutions, that they will not contribute to them investing in a highly skilled welding academy in Glasgow tells the public that they don鈥檛 care about jobs, growth and opportunities for the future. 鈥淭hat is a huge part of the defence dividend we should be trying to capture. Places like Babcock and BAE systems are hiring foreign welders from the Philippines and South Africa to do the work local people should be doing. 鈥淪o yes their stance should change, not just on defensive nuclear but on civilian nuclear as well.鈥 The SNP鈥檚 Westminster defence spokesman accused Keir Starmer of pandering to Donald Trump to 鈥渕ake him relevant鈥 after agreeing to buy a dozen new fighter jets capable of transporting US nuclear weapons. Dave Doogan, MP for Angus and Perthshire Glens, said his party鈥檚 stance on nuclear was in line with the Scottish population and said the UK Government was not being honest about the country鈥檚 own nuclear capability. He said: 鈥 The SNP鈥檚 position on nuclear remains resolute insofar as we鈥檙e against it. We believe we鈥檙e firmly in step with the vast majority of civil society in Scotland on that point. 鈥淚an Murray, consistent with many other issues, is not in step with the majority of civil society in Scotland. 鈥淚鈥檝e spoken to armed forces professionals who deal with the nuclear deterrent and nobody talks about it in the triumphant way in which Westminster politicians of the two main parties do. 鈥淭hey know keenly that nuclear weapons are an evil. They would see it as a necessary evil, I take a different view.鈥 Doogan said the public were 鈥渂eing taken for mugs鈥 by Starmer following the announcement about the dozen F-35A jets and said the US would really be in control if it came to delivering nuclear attacks. He said: 鈥淭he announcement is an absolute disgrace. The Americans have instructed the United Kingdom to not buy 12 F-35B variants, which is the vertical takeoff model that the UK wanted, and swap them for 12 鈥楢鈥 variants that can鈥檛 be operated off the UK鈥檚 aircraft carriers. 鈥淭hey have to operate off land so they can carry America鈥檚 nuclear weapons for America, store them in the United kingdom and launch them in a way that America determines, without a debate or a manifesto commitment on any of this. 鈥淧eople are being taken for mugs.鈥 Doogan said the purchase will see the UK 鈥渂ecome an arms-length nuclear franchise for the United States鈥 and said: 鈥淣o other nuclear power delivers another nuclear power鈥檚 nuclear weapons. 鈥淭here are five nuclear sharing nations in Europe who have agreed that in time of war they will assist with United States nuclear weapons. None of those countries have massive nuclear weapons bills like the UK. 鈥淥nly the UK is lining up to deliver America鈥檚 nuclear weapons for America while being a nuclear power. 鈥淚t is yet another example of the current Labour government falling at the feet of the Trump administration, begging for him to make them relevant.鈥 He said the money spent on nuclear weapons in the UK was 鈥渙ne of the reasons why the conventional armed forces are in the state that they are in.鈥 He said: 鈥淭he SNP believe not that we should be disinvesting from nuclear weapons so that we can disinvest in defence – far from it. 鈥淲e could have a far more robust defence posture of conventional armed forces, that Scotland deserves, without the hundreds of millions that鈥檚 getting spent on dreadnought-class submarines and weapons. 鈥淲e believe nuclear weapons are morally wrong and that the UK鈥檚 possession is surplus to requirements that exist in a genuinely independent way within NATO. 鈥淭hey certainly shouldn鈥檛 be in Scotland鈥檚 waters without a by your leave.鈥

Read More…