By Daniel Martin
Sir Keir Starmer has told hospitals and universities to obey the law and ban transgender women from female lavatories 鈥渁s soon as possible鈥.
The Prime Minister said public bodies must stop dragging their feet and comply with April鈥檚 Supreme Court ruling, which found that trans women are not legally women.
The judgment on the meaning of the word sex in the Equality Act means that amenities such as toilets and changing rooms have to be separated by biological sex and not-identified gender.
But two months on, dozens of NHS trusts and other organisations up and down the country have failed to change their guidance, meaning biological men are still being allowed in women鈥檚 lavatories and changing rooms.
Women鈥檚 rights groups say this puts female staff at risk because most sexual abuse is carried out by biological men.
Now, Sir Keir has lost patience with organisations that are still failing to comply with the law.
鈥榃e鈥檝e accepted the ruling鈥
The Prime Minister said: 鈥淲e鈥檝e accepted the ruling, welcomed the ruling, and everything else flows from that as far as I鈥檓 concerned.
鈥淭herefore all guidance of whatever kind needs to be consistent with the ruling and we need to get to that position as soon as possible.鈥
Soon after the ruling, the EHRC came up with interim guidance that said that in places like hospitals, shops and restaurants, 鈥渢rans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women鈥檚 facilities鈥.
It is now consulting on the details of its guidance, but Baroness Kishwer Falkner, chairman, has said the main thrust of the advice will not change.
Despite this, most NHS organisations and universities have said they are waiting for the EHRC guidance before updating their policies.
But the Prime Minister鈥檚 comments indicate he has little sympathy with this argument.
鈥楴o need to wait for further guidance鈥
Maya Forstater, chief executive of the women鈥檚 rights charity Sex Matters, said: 鈥淭his is an important intervention from the Prime Minister, given the huge number of public bodies failing to implement the Supreme Court judgment and therefore operating outside the law.
鈥淧olitical leadership is essential if women whose rights are being stolen are not to be forced to turn to the courts, where public bodies will end up losing, at great expense to taxpayers.鈥
She added that the law is clear and there is 鈥渘o need to wait for further guidance from the EHRC or anyone else鈥.
A growing number of public bodies are changing their guidance in light of the judgment. The Football Association, for example, has said trans women would be banned from women鈥檚 sport.
The Houses of Parliament announced last week that it had changed its position, saying that visitors should use 鈥渢he facilities that correspond to their biological sex鈥. Trans people were instructed to use gender-neutral lavatories on the estate.
However, a large number of public organisations have still not changed their guidance.
The ruling is of particular importance for universities, many of which organise sports teams and continue to allow biological men to participate in female sports.
鈥楴ot making changes鈥
Leeds University said: 鈥淔or the avoidance of doubt, we are not making any changes to how we provide campus facilities.
鈥淲e will not do so unless there is clear legal obligation, and we have meaningfully consulted with those most directly impacted. This is about getting things right 鈥 not about rushing to respond.鈥
Liverpool University said: 鈥淎ny practical implications in applying the ruling to our facilities and activities are not yet clear and along with other universities, we now need to wait for more detailed guidance.
鈥淎s such, there are no immediate changes to any university policies.鈥
As for the NHS, a group of eight nurses in Darlington is challenging their health trust鈥檚 policy over allowing a trans colleague to use the female changing rooms at work.
The national body 鈥 NHS England 鈥 is still to publish guidance on the Supreme Court ruling.
The NHS Confederation, which represents trusts, has withdrawn pro-trans guidance but has not yet updated it.
A number of other regional organisations have indicated their advice will not change, at least for the time being.
NHS Sussex said: 鈥淭here should be no change in terms of how services are delivered as the NHS nationally considers the judgment.
鈥淔urther to this, we understand that the update provided by the Equality and Human Rights Commission has led to concern. NHS Sussex will fully participate in a code of practice consultation when it launches to ensure that the protections of the Equality Act endorsed by the Supreme Court are upheld.鈥