A Scientist Says the Universe May Have a Memory of Its Own

A Scientist Says the Universe May Have a Memory of Its Own

Here鈥檚 what you鈥檒l learn when you read this story:A new hypothesis known as the Quantum Memory Matrix (QMM) could help explain some of the biggest mysteries of the universe, including the Black Hole Information Paradox. The idea is that space-time itself holds a history of quantum information in 鈥渕emory cells.鈥 This is just one of many hypotheses that aim to explain the paradoxes that form when general relativity and quantum field theory collide.Paradoxes can be scary things in science, as they almost always represent some fundamental misunderstanding of reality and the universe. However, paradoxes can also present opportunities鈥攃hances to re-examine what we know and forge previously unimaginable paths toward new understanding. For example, the Fermi Paradox鈥攚hich questions why there are so many extraterrestrial worlds, yet absolutely no signs of intelligent life鈥攈as pushed scientists to explore various reasons why the universe is so silent. Various temporal paradoxes, such as the Grandfather paradox, have allowed us to probe mind-bending concepts like the multiverse theory. And the same can be said for the Black Hole Information Paradox. First formulated in the 1970s by physicist Stephen Hawking, the paradox boils down to the idea that black holes appear to destroy information (via Hawking radiation) over incredibly long timescales. However, quantum field theory suggests that quantum information cannot be destroyed, and instead must be conserved. This has led to several theories, including that information is somehow encoded onto the event horizon of the black hole itself and released within the Hawking radiation in a way we simply can鈥檛 detect, or that it even travels to a completely different universe. But for years, Florian Neukart鈥攁n assistant professor at Leiden University and the chief product officer at the quantum computing outfit Terra Quantum鈥攈as promoted another fascinating idea known as 鈥淨uantum Memory Matrix,鈥 or QMM. In a new article published in New Scientist, Neukart details how space-time itself could retain a 鈥渕emory鈥 that recorded the history of the universe. In a sense, according to Neukart, space-time is a blanket of 鈥渕emory cells鈥 that could not only solve the Black Hole Information Paradox, but could clarify other major space-time conundrums like dark matter. 鈥淗ow can empty space hold information when there is nothing 鈥渋nside it鈥 to change? The key is to realize that modern physics describes all particles and forces as excitations in quantum fields鈥攎athematical structures that span space and time,鈥 Neukart wrote in New Scientist. 鈥淪pace-time itself is, in principle, no different, and each of my cells of space-time would have a quantum state that can change. Imagine it as like a tiny dial or switch. There is also a more emergent kind of quantum information at play that describes the relationship of each cell to the others鈥攖his isn鈥檛 held in any one cell, but in the sprawling network of relationships between them.鈥滻n the Black Hole Information Paradox, for example, as an object moves through space, it interacts with these 鈥渄ials鈥 of space-time that imprint information. When a black hole evaporates鈥攁 process that takes around 1068 to 10103 years鈥攖he surrounding space-time will remain.鈥淚nformation doesn鈥檛 vanish after all,鈥 Neukart said. 鈥淚t has been written somewhere we hadn鈥檛 thought to look.鈥漌orking with quantum computers to test this idea, Neukart said that they鈥檝e extended the framework beyond gravity, insisting that QMM extends to all four fundamental forces of nature. Additionally, Neukart posited that the 鈥渨eight of information woven into space-time鈥 could be an alternative explanation for dark matter鈥攁 weakly interacting form of matter that is one of the big missing puzzle pieces of the Standard Model. For now, QMM is just another radical-yet-fascinating potential solution to a long-standing paradox. It could be be far from the truth, or closer to reality than we might expect, but it undoubtedly stands as evidence of paradoxes being roiling cauldrons of scientific creativity.

Read More…