By Alexander Vindman
The launch of Operation Midnight Hammer is the most significant foreign policy decision made by the second Trump administration to date. However, judging from recent reporting from within Republican circles, the decision to launch Midnight Hammer has also represented one of the largest political schisms within the Trump administration.
Six months into his second presidency, the broad political coalition that previously carried Trump to victory appears to be cracking. With midterm elections right around the corner, a combination of infighting on the right and growing public dissatisfaction with the Trump administration may spell disaster for the GOP.
The earliest signs of discord within the second Trump administration鈥檚 ranks came shortly after Vivek Ramaswamy鈥檚 appointment to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) alongside Elon Musk.
In a long-form tweet Vivek critiqued American work ethic and argued that the United States held a culture of 鈥渕ediocrity鈥. Vivek鈥檚 observations kicked off a civil war inside the MAGA sphere on whether or not H1-B visa recipients were taking jobs from American workers, leading to friction between the GOP鈥檚 recent Silicon Valley converts and entrenched nativists in the Republican Party.
Even with the support of Elon and Trump, Vivek was quickly cast aside from his role at DOGE and relegated to running as Trump鈥檚 surrogate in the Ohio governor race.
The second major schism in the MAGA movement came with the disagreement between Elon and congressional Republicans over the proposed federal budget. Having failed to deliver on the initial goal of a $1 trillion dollar reduction in federal spending through DOGE, Elon was convinced that his influence over Trump would be enough to reduce government spending and secure a smaller budget.
When Trump鈥檚 鈥渂ig beautiful bill鈥 (BBB) included an increase in spending, Elon took to Twitter to unload on Trump and the GOP. The schism between Elon and Trump grew to the point that SpaceX鈥檚 relationship with NASA was brought into question.
While both sides eventually deescalated their attacks on one-another, the damage was done: Elon was removed from the White House and effectively exiled from Trump鈥檚 inner circle.
The most recent divide within the MAGA-sphere comes with Operation Midnight Hammer. Trump鈥檚 decision to strike several locations connected to the Iranian nuclear program was opposed by Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tulsi Gabbard, and Steve Bannon.
These three figures each represent an individual splinter of the MAGA movement: Marjorie Taylor Greene is the de-facto leader of a far-right faction of congressional Republicans that have repeatedly challenged the GOP establishment, Gabbard is a former Democrat-turned-Republican 鈥渁nti-war鈥 figure who has repeated Russian talking points on Ukraine and Syria, and Bannon is a nativist ideologue behind the populist messaging of the first Trump administration.
These three figures saw a potential war with Iran as being in the interest of an entrenched Neoconservative establishment, or the 鈥淒eep State鈥, and fundamentally incompatible with the isolationist elements of the MAGA agenda.
Beyond the credible threat of Iran鈥檚 nuclear weapons program, Trump鈥檚 calculus behind launching Midnight Hammer (and publicly denouncing Gabbard in the process) may have been that dissenting voices in the administration and Republican ranks will eventually fall in line and that the public approval bump of a successful military operation would outweigh any ideological conflicts in the party.
Judging from recent developments, all signs point to the political schism within the MAGA movement only growing larger.
Elon Musk and Donald Trump have resumed their attacks on one-another, with Trump threatening to potentially deport Elon and cut funding for Tesla and SpaceX and Elon threatening to primary Republican proponents of the BBB and start his own political party.
Republican Senator Tillis of North Carolina has announced that he will not run for reelection and claimed that the proposed cuts to Medicaid included in the BBB would 鈥渂etray the promise Donald Trump made鈥. Tillis鈥 statement implies that there is a dissonance between the promises and populist messaging of the second Trump campaign and the potential negative impact to millions of Americans dependent on Medicaid if Trump鈥檚 BBB passes. The big-tent alliance that carried Trump to victory is coming apart.
As the MAGA world slides into chaos and infighting, the Democrats have an opportunity to lay the groundwork for a sweeping victory in 2026. The contradictions between the content of the BBB and Trump鈥檚 promises should be a reminder that the populist messaging of the Trump campaign has always been a cover for an agenda that will actively harm the average American.
It鈥檚 not enough to simply highlight the failure of MAGA and MAHA to deliver on their promises – the Democrats must aggressively push an alternative vision for American prosperity. Instead of relaying deeply flawed characters, this cause must be championed by candidates who have both the policy background and political instincts needed to effectively oppose Trump and the MAGA sphere.
With effective planning, fine-tuned messaging, and an agenda that will deliver prosperity and stability to the average American, the Democrats can overtake the crumbling MAGA coalition and secure an overwhelming victory in 2026.
Reprinted from the author鈥檚 blog 鈥淲hy it Matters.鈥 See the original here.