Sigma’s new lens isn’t just a prime killer –it may be a full-frame camera killer, too – 1v1 Video Chat & LIve Streaming & Influencer Subscription

Digital Camera World

Digital Camera World THE HOME OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY

Search Digital Camera World

View Profile

Accessories

Buying Guides

The Photography & Video Show

Digital Camera

Australian Camera

Australian ProPhoto

Photography Magazines

Why subscribe?

Issues filled with product reviews, latest updates, expert advice and more
Delivered to your Android or IOS device
Every issue is packed with photo tips, kit reviews and inspiration

From$12View

Camera news
Camera rumors
Photography & Video Show
Photo mag deals
Cheatsheets

You may like

Sigma announces groundbreaking 17-40mm f/1.8 Art lens for APS-C mirrorless cameras

Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | C review: a travel lens that aims to really put the ‘super’ into superzoom

This pro photographer prefers a 35mm prime for portraits – and this is why

There are lots of asterisks involved in that premise, of course. So let me reframe the question about this lens, which is an effective 26-60mm f/1.8 on Sony, Fujifilm and L-Mount, and 27-64mm on Canon RF.

Consider this…
If I was buying a camera from scratch, would I be better served to get a full frame Canon EOS R8 and an RF 28mm f/2.8, RF 35mm f/1.8 and RF 50mm f/1.8 lens, or an APS-C Canon EOS R10 with the Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8?
In almost every way, the latter is a superior setup. It’s smaller, lighter, cheaper, and gives you significantly more reach at the long end and a significantly faster aperture at the wide end. And, of course, it’s one lens instead of three lenses (which don’t even cover the same range).
Obviously, for bokeh freaks, you don’t get the same shallow depth of field at those equivalent angles of view – though honestly, there’s not a huge amount of difference between the Sigma zoom at 40mm at f/1.8 and the Canon 50mm prime at f/1.8 (and you get increased, effective magnification of 64mm).

Get the Digital Camera World Newsletter
The best camera deals, reviews, product advice, and unmissable photography news, direct to your inbox!
Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.
If you’re a pixel peeper, you can compare our test charts between all those lenses – but from my real-world shooting, there’s not much between them.

The Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | A mounted to a Canon EOS R10 – a fantastic tag team (Image credit: James Artaius)
So at the very least, if you’re an APS-C photographer, I think yes – this does in fact replace a bunch of primes.
There may be principles that mean you don’t want it to (if you believe that fixed focal lengths are a “purer” way to shoot, for example), but in terms of performance you aren’t losing anything unless you compare this to the superior f/1.4 and f/1.2 primes.
Does it really replace the need for full frame, though? Honestly, for some people, I think it could.
A whole lot of people, among them working professionals, have a 24-70mm f/2.8 standard zoom lens almost permanently fixed to the front of their full-frame camera. That covers everyone from enthusiasts and hobbyists to people who photograph weddings and events.
Now consider THIS…
So let’s ask another version of my previous question. Would I be better off buying a full frame EOS R8 with a Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.L lens or an EOS R10 with the Sigma 18-40mm f/1.8 (which, again, gives us an equivalent 27-64mm range)?
Some perspective. The R8 will set you back $1,600 / £1,200 / AU$2,600 while the 24-70mm will run you $2,600 / £2,600 / AU$4,200. By contrast, the R10 goes for $980 / £850 / AU$1,500 and the 17-40mm costs $920 / £780 / AU$1,500.
That’s $4,200 / £3,800 / AU$6,800 for the full-frame combo versus $1,900 / £1,630 / AU$3,000 for the APS-C setup.
Now you tell me: is the extra 3mm at the wide end and 6mm at the long end worth over double the cost? Or the perceived “better image quality” of a larger sensor? The better sensitivity I’ll give you, but I seriously can’t remember the last time I intentionally shot above the R10’s ISO32,000 ceiling.

I’m not saying the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L isn’t a better lens. I’m just saying, for most people, it’s not that much different in effective terms (Image credit: Gareth Bevan / Future)
Yes the 24-70mm f/2.8L lens performs better if you pixel peep. But all most people really care about is how different the rendering is – and if you’re worried about your blurry backgrounds, 70mm at f/2.8 looks almost identical to 40mm at f/1.8 (which, again, benefits from the magnification of being an effective 64mm on Canon APS-C).
Personally, I’d go the APS-C route and either sink the extra cash in a second body or a bunch of additional glass – or better yet, just keep that money in my bank account.
Obviously one lens isn’t going to make an entire sensor format extinct. But for a certain kind of shooter, who primarily shoots in the standard zoom range, you might have to reexamine a lot of received wisdom about what full-frame really has to offer.
Sigma’s new lens redefines a lot of the rules. And if you’re an APS-C user, or someone who’s weighing up whether to upgrade to a larger sensor, you might just find that bigger isn’t really better.
You might also like…
If you think I’m full of hogwash, take a look at the best full frame cameras. And if you own one (or both!) of them, check out the best lenses for the Canon EOS R8 and the best lenses for the Canon EOS R10.

James Artaius

Social Links Navigation
Editor in Chief

James has 25 years experience as a journalist, serving as the head of Digital Camera World for 7 of them. He started working in the photography industry in 2014, product testing and shooting ad campaigns for Olympus, as well as clients like Aston Martin Racing, Elinchrom and L’Oréal. An Olympus / OM System, Canon and Hasselblad shooter, he has a wealth of knowledge on cameras of all makes – and he loves instant cameras, too.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

Sigma announces groundbreaking 17-40mm f/1.8 Art lens for APS-C mirrorless cameras

Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | C review: a travel lens that aims to really put the ‘super’ into superzoom

This pro photographer prefers a 35mm prime for portraits – and this is why

“The Sigma BF is as audacious as it is daring, but it’s hard to pin down exactly what it is. Fashion statement? Prestige product? Luxurious point-and-shoot camera? All the above?”

Why photographers are ditching branded lenses for low-cost indie alternatives

Sony’s new 50-150mm f/2 GM Is the lens we were told couldn’t exist

Latest in Lenses

This silver Nikon-fit prime is limited to just 100 pieces, and it doesn’t cost the Earth

High demand forces Sigma to issue an official apology in Japan

A 3D-printed lens with only two elements shouldn’t look this good

Best Voigtländer Z-mount primes are now offering up to $355 off

Vintage design, modern depth: Thypoch launches 21mm f/1.4 simera

Nikon has raised prices due to US tariffs. This is the gear that has been hit the hardest

Latest in Features

“We have melted carcasses of cameras just lining the camera case” – MrBeast’s crew shares what goes on behind the scenes of YouTube’s most popular channel

I’ve tried lots of options, but this 360 camera is now my favorite solution for behind-the-scenes content of my professional photo shoots

Trends have made Fujifilm exceptionally popular – but the Fujifilm X-T30 II is actually the brand’s best-selling mirrorless on Amazon

I scoured New York City’s largest gathering of photographers and creators for the coolest photo and video accessories. These were my favorites

The RX0 II – how does Sony keep making brilliant disasters and miss open goals?

Photographers always say bigger sensors are better, but I prefer Micro Four Thirds for these two genres