Last-minute concessions to the Government鈥檚 controversial welfare reforms have been welcomed by some campaigners but described as not good enough by others.
Here, the PA news agency takes a look at what the changes are and how Labour MPs and disability groups have reacted.
鈥 What had the Government originally planned?
In March, reforms to the welfare system 鈥 aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work 鈥 were announced.
The Government said the changes, including restricting access to the main disability benefit known as Pip (personal independence payment) and the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC), were expected to make welfare savings of 拢4.8 billion by 2029-30.
With around 1,000 new Pip awards every day 鈥 鈥渢he equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year鈥, the Government argued the current situation was unsustainable.
An impact assessment published alongside the Bill included estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules would see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of 拢4,500 per year.
Changes to UC were expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of 拢500 per year.
Overall, as a result of the changes, it was estimated some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, across Great Britain were likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs by the end of the decade.
鈥 What concessions have been made?
In a late-night letter to MPs, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall conceded two changes she said would 鈥渟trengthen the Bill鈥.
In recognition of the 鈥渦ncertainty and anxiety鈥 caused by the proposed changes, she said all current Pip recipients would keep their benefits, saying only new claims from November 2026 will come under the tightened eligibility requirements.
An impact assessment had stated that 370,000 current recipients were set to lose Pip entitlement across England and Wales.
Ms Kendall also vowed all those currently receiving the UC health element, as well as new claimants meeting the severe conditions criteria, will have their incomes 鈥渇ully protected in real terms鈥.
The Work and Pensions Secretary has also promised a review of the Pip assessment, led by social security and disability minister Sir Stephen Timms, which will have input from disabled people 鈥渢o ensure the benefit is fair and fit for the future鈥.
鈥 What are disability groups saying?
Mikey Erhardt, from Disability Rights UK, accused the Government of 鈥減laying politics with our lives鈥, insisting the Bill must still be pulled.
He said the changes will mean 鈥渁 benefits system where future generations of disabled people receive less support than disabled people today鈥 and added that, in making the original announcement of cuts, the Government had 鈥減rioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of disabled citizens鈥.
Mr Erhardt added: 鈥淒espite seemingly rowing back on some of the worst aspects of its plans, the Government is still attempting to slash billions of pounds from a system that doesn鈥檛 provide enough support as it stands.鈥
The MS Society said the Government was simply 鈥渒icking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster鈥, and urged MPs 鈥渘ot to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions鈥.
Food bank network Trussell welcomed the 鈥渟ignificant鈥 concessions but said the proposals 鈥渟till present a bleak future for future claimants and still risk placing the Government鈥檚 commitments to end the need for emergency food and tackle poverty in serious jeopardy鈥.
鈥 What are Labour MPs saying?
Dame Meg Hillier, one of the leading rebel voices, described the concessions as 鈥渁 good deal鈥 involving 鈥渕assive changes鈥 to protect vulnerable people and involve disabled people in the design of future reforms.
She said: 鈥淚t鈥檚 encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed.鈥
Health minister Stephen Kinnock said he is confident the welfare reforms 鈥 being brought under the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill 鈥 will pass a vote in the Commons on Tuesday in the wake of the concessions.
But some Labour MPs are still not satisfied, with Nadia Whittome saying the concessions are 鈥渘owhere near good enough鈥, vowing to still vote against the Bill unless 鈥渟erious鈥 proposals are made to 鈥減rotect the dignity of disabled people鈥.
Speaking to the Today programme on BBC Radio 4, she said MPs she had spoken to 鈥渁re sticking to their position because we understand that we are answerable to our constituents鈥.
Ms Whittome added: 鈥淚f the Government doesn鈥檛 pull the Bill, doesn鈥檛 consult properly with disabled people and come back to MPs with a serious proposal that protects the dignity of disabled people, I will vote against and I will be far from the only one.鈥